Key Concepts in Gas Turbine Engine Zero-Dimensional (0D) and One-Dimensional (1D) Simulation

I. Introduction to Reduced-Order Gas Turbine Modeling

I.A. Context and Rationale for Low-Dimensional Simulation The contemporary landscape of gas turbine engine development—driven by demands for improved efficiency, reduced emissions, and the exploration of novel thermodynamic cycles—necessitates sophisticated multi-physics simulation tools. During the early phases of conceptual design and system development, speed and versatility are paramount. High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD), while providing detailed features of thermodynamics and turbulence for component design, incurs prohibitively high simulation time and resource costs. To circumvent these constraints, engineers rely extensively on reduced-order models, namely 0D and 1D simulations, which allow for rapid evaluation of system architecture and performance envelopes. These low-dimensional models are capable of providing quasi-real-time calculations, making it feasible to test thousands of design alternatives or system configurations, a process that would be impossible using high-dimensional methods. The utilization of 0D/1D models serves as an essential risk mitigation strategy, allowing engineers to validate system-level feasibility and map the operational characteristics before committing extensive resources to component-level optimization via 3D analysis or physical prototyping. They function as the crucial system-level integrator, often taking highly validated performance data (maps) derived from or validated against detailed 3D CFD studies, thereby establishing a necessary multi-fidelity approach to engine design.

SimTurbo(c) Representation of a Single Spool Gas Turbine Engine with Control System.

I.B. Defining Dimensionality: Zero-Dimensional vs. One-Dimensional Concepts The classification of 0D and 1D simulation relates fundamentally to the manner in which spatial dependency is treated within the model. Both methodologies simplify the continuous physical behavior to enable faster computation, but they differ significantly in their level of spatial resolution.

I.B.1. Zero-Dimensional (0D) Modeling: The Lumped Parameter Approach Zero-Dimensional simulation, often synonymous with the lumped-element model or lumped parameter model, assumes that physical variables or properties within a defined element are treated without spatial dependency, although time dependency is retained for transient analysis. Each engine component, such as a compressor or combustor, is represented as a single control volume or "black box," focusing exclusively on overall performance characteristics relating inlet and outlet conditions. This modeling technique is defined by its mathematical abstraction: it reduces the state space of the physical system by transforming the partial differential equations (PDEs) that govern continuous time and space behavior into a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) or differential-algebraic equations (DAEs). This simplification is analogous to modeling complex fluid, thermal, or electrical systems using concentrated components like resistors, capacitors, and inductors connected at nodes (lumped circuits), where the flow rate corresponds to current, and pressure drop corresponds to voltage drop.

I.B.2. One-Dimensional (1D) Modeling: Distributed Parameter Systems One-Dimensional simulation, often employed as a quasi-1D approach, retains dependency on one spatial dimension (typically along the axis of flow) in addition to time dependency. This method treats the physical system as a distributed parameter system, contrasting with the concentrated nature of 0D models. The core difference is that 1D modeling discretizes the flow path into elements, allowing fluid properties to vary axially, which permits the capture of wave dynamics and distributed effects that a 0D model cannot resolve. This technique relies on the one-dimensional forms of the fundamental conservation laws, which constitute a set of partial differential equations (PDEs), such as the hyperbolic conservation laws used for gas dynamics. 1D models are especially valuable for analyzing flow in ducts, piping systems, and inter-component volumes where axial variations in flow velocity, pressure, and temperature are significant, while radial and circumferential variations are averaged or neglected. II. The Zero-Dimensional (0D) Modeling Framework

II.A. Thermodynamic Cycle Basis and Control Volume Analysis The fundamental methodology of 0D gas turbine simulation is rooted in thermodynamic cycle analysis, specifically the application of the Brayton cycle, where the engine is conceptually divided into finite control volumes defined by the boundaries of its major components (inlet, compressor, combustor, turbine, nozzle). Within this finite control volume approach, mass and energy conservation principles are applied to each component to relate the total properties of the working fluid—namely, total temperature (T_t) and total pressure (P_t)—between the component's inlet and outlet stations. The engine model starts with the definition of a Design Point (DP), which represents the reference, or ideal "healthy engine," condition. This point involves determining the component performance requirements (e.g., pressure ratios, mass flows, efficiencies) and required geometry (e.g., throat area) necessary to achieve the target thrust or power output. The design point establishes the baseline against which all off-design and transient performance calculations are compared.

Brayton Cycle Analysis using SimTurbo(c)

II.B. Component Representation via Characteristic Maps A defining characteristic of 0D modeling is the abstraction of complex, three-dimensional turbomachinery aerodynamics into empirical datasets known as characteristic maps. These maps are the primary input required for the simulation, enabling the model to predict how a component will perform across its operational envelope without requiring detailed geometry or internal flow field computation.

II.B.1. Map Structure and Scaling For turbomachinery components such as the compressor or turbine, the performance map acts as a multi-variable lookup table relating key non-dimensional parameters: corrected mass flow (\dot{W}_c), corrected shaft speed (N_c), pressure ratio (PR), and isentropic efficiency (\eta). The use of corrected parameters normalizes the data to standard reference conditions, factoring out variations in ambient temperature and pressure at the component inlet. These characteristic maps are derived from extensive component testing on specialized rigs or, increasingly, generated computationally using detailed 3D CFD analyses of the blade profiles and flow paths. The dependence of 0D models on these maps introduces a critical challenge: for engines in the preliminary design stage, high-fidelity maps are typically proprietary or unavailable. This necessitates the use of map scaling procedures. Scaling techniques, such as single-point or multi-point methods, are employed to generate estimated characteristic maps for a new design based on existing data from aerodynamically similar, proven engine components.

Compressor and Turbine Maps represented in SimTurbo(c)

II.B.2. Extrapolation and Fidelity Constraints The operational fidelity of a conceptual 0D model is critically dependent on the quality and accuracy of the scaled map data. Furthermore, accurately predicting engine behavior during extreme operations, such as high-altitude restarts or rapid transients, requires extrapolating the maps beyond the measured stable operating lines into regions defined by surge/stall and choke limits. The apparent simplicity and minimal data requirements of the 0D approach conceal a high dependence on this underlying meta-data. Errors introduced during map scaling or extrapolation—particularly in defining the transient limits (like the surge line or maximum flow capability)—can lead to significant inaccuracies in stability prediction and control law development. Consequently, specialized, physical-based algorithms are often integrated into 0D/1D environments to ensure robust extrapolation behavior, sometimes even modeling the negative mass flow rate area associated with reverse flow during surge events.

III. Physics-Based One-Dimensional (1D) Flow Modeling

III.A. Fundamentals of Distributed Parameter Systems and Governing Equations Unlike 0D modeling, which simplifies components into algebraic relations governed by maps, 1D flow modeling discretizes the entire fluid path into discrete elements, allowing for the propagation of flow properties and wave phenomena along the flow axis. This method is crucial for systems requiring accurate prediction of pressure wave dynamics or detailed duct flow analysis, common in intake systems, exhaust systems, and unsteady combustion cycles. The core formulation of 1D flow modeling demands that the model satisfy four fundamental conservation laws across every flow element and junction within the network. These laws, expressed in their one-dimensional form, yield a system of coupled hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs) : 1. Conservation of Mass (Continuity): Ensures that mass flow is conserved, accounting for mass storage effects within the control volume elements during transient operation. 2. Conservation of Momentum: Integrates pressure forces, viscous forces (friction), and any relevant body forces acting on the fluid stream. 3. Conservation of Energy (First Law of Thermodynamics): Tracks changes in the total enthalpy or total temperature, accounting for shaft work (\dot{W}_s) extracted or added, and heat transfer (\dot{Q}) to or from the component walls. 4. Conservation of Entropy (Second Law of Thermodynamics): This law is foundational for maintaining the physical accuracy of the simulation. Entropy is a measure of irreversibility; its conservation ensures that losses are correctly accounted for. The overall objective of 1D analysis is achieved only when the flow network predictions are thermodynamically sound, meaning the entropy generation due to irreversible processes is correctly modeled. The increase in entropy due to heat transfer or internal friction provides a criterion that can be utilized to determine the physical flow direction within an element.

III.B. Modeling Loss Mechanisms and Heat Transfer in 1D Since 1D models replace the detailed 3D Navier-Stokes calculation with an averaged axial flow assumption, non-ideal effects—which are intrinsically 3D phenomena—must be introduced via sub-models or empirical correlations.

III.B.1. Viscous Friction and Pressure Losses Losses in turbomachinery components, defined fundamentally in terms of entropy increase, originate primarily from viscous effects in boundary layers, mixing processes, and shock waves. In 1D flow path modeling, viscous friction loss is typically accounted for by introducing a mean friction factor into the momentum equation. For complex flow geometries, such as cooling passages (which may include features like turbulators, pin fins, or 180^\circ turns) or volutes, empirical correlations are used to calculate pressure loss coefficients. Advanced quasi-1D models, particularly for components like radial turbine volutes, utilize boundary layer-based momentum integral methods applied to the quasi-1D flow path. This approach allows the model to predict total pressure loss with acceptable accuracy (e.g., typically less than 10\% error compared to CFD) while consuming negligible computational power, vastly superior to simple, fully developed pipe flow models.

III.B.2. Convective Heat Transfer Heat transfer between the working fluid and the surrounding structure is integrated into the 1D energy equation, which subsequently dictates the change in gas total temperature along the flow path. For convective heat transfer, 1D models often assume the duct control volume walls are isothermal, possessing a constant wall temperature T_w. The heat transfer coefficient h is either specified or derived from appropriate empirical correlations for the given geometry. Based on this framework, the change in gas total temperature due to heat transfer (\Delta T_{t R})_{\text{HT}} can be calculated using exponential decay models derived from integrated energy equations. This requires tracking the mean wall temperature (\vartheta_w(t)) via a differential equation representing the energy balance between the gas and the metal structure, a concept crucial for integrating thermal inertia into the transient model. IV. Core Concepts in Steady-State and Off-Design Simulation

IV.A. The Necessity of Component Matching The operation of a gas turbine engine, whether in flight or for power generation, relies on a delicate system balance. For the engine to achieve a stable steady-state (equilibrium) operating point, a fundamental thermodynamic and mechanical interdependence, known as component matching, must be satisfied. Achieving this equilibrium requires the simultaneous satisfaction of three primary conditions throughout the engine cycle: 1. Mass Flow Continuity: The gas mass flow rate across every section and component boundary must be continuous. In a system context, the mass flow exiting one component (e.g., compressor) must equal the mass flow entering the next (e.g., combustor). 2. Torque Balance (Mechanical Matching): For any shared rotating spool (shaft), the power extracted by the turbine must exactly equal the power consumed by the compressor and any mechanical loads (e.g., gearbox, generator) attached to that spool. Mathematically, the net torque on the shaft must be zero for steady-state operation. 3. Nozzle/Exhaust Flow Balance: The final flow area (typically the nozzle throat) must pass the mass flow rate leaving the final turbine stage, consistent with the pressure ratio across the nozzle, ensuring the thrust or power demand is met. The standard simulation technique is the component-matched method, where performance maps for each key component are utilized independently. The overall engine simulation then iteratively solves a set of residual equations until all criteria (mass, torque, and flow) are reconciled, confirming the co-working state of the engine.

IV.B. Implementation of Iterative Solution Schemes (Newton-Raphson Method) The process of component matching involves solving a system of highly non-linear algebraic equations, where the component relationships are defined by empirical maps. Since these non-linearities preclude direct solution, robust numerical iterative schemes are essential.

IV.B.1. Solving Residual Equations The matching problem is framed by defining a set of error terms (residuals) that quantify the degree of mismatch, such as the torque imbalance on a spool or the difference in mass flow between two connected components. The solution involves iteratively adjusting a vector of unknown variables (ee.g., corrected shaft speed, fuel flow, burner pressure ratio) until these residuals are driven to zero. The Newton-Raphson method is overwhelmingly the standard iterative technique used in 0D/1D engine simulation environments due to its highly efficient computational characteristics. This method relies on calculating the sensitivity of the residual errors to small changes in the unknown variables, forming a Jacobian matrix. By inverting and solving this matrix system, the solver determines the adjustments needed for the next iteration. This mechanism provides fast convergence (quadratic convergence), crucial for achieving cycle balance at high speeds. The reliance on such a high-performing numerical method is fundamental to enabling the quasi-real-time performance required for complex engineering tasks, such as Hardware-in-the-Loop simulations, often yielding superior performance compared to methods like Broyden's.

IV.B.2. Steady-State Operation Mapping Once the design point and the required component maps are established, the engine’s performance across its entire operational envelope (Off-Design, OD) can be mapped. This analysis involves examining how the engine performs under varying boundary conditions, such as changes in altitude, ambient temperature, or fuel flow settings. The successful execution of off-design analysis provides performance levels guaranteed to the customer and is essential for developing comprehensive engine health monitoring parameters (e.g., flow factor, efficiency factor). The mathematical schemes used to manage steady-state and simple dynamic simulations are summarized below: Core Iterative Schemes for Component Matching Scheme Component-Matched Method Principle Solves residual equations based on 0D thermal cycle and map data. Application in GT Simulation Steady-state (Design and Off-Design) performance calculation. Key Advantage Simplicity and use of standardized component maps. Newton-Raphson Method Greitzer Lumped-Parameter Model Solves non-linear equations by calculating sensitivities (Jacobian matrix). Solves coupled ODEs describing fluid inertia and volume storage effects. Driving torque/flow residual errors to zero during component matching. Predicting dynamic boundaries (surge/stall) and transient stability analysis. High efficiency and fast convergence for real-time applications. Simulates complex instability dynamics with minimal complexity.

V. Dynamics and Transient Engine Performance Modeling Transient simulation models the engine’s response during non-equilibrium operation, such as acceleration or deceleration, when system properties shift from one steady-state point to another. This requires transforming the steady-state algebraic models into time-dependent ODEs/DAEs that incorporate dynamic energy and mass storage effects.

Single Spool Turbojet Start Transient Analysis using SimTurbo(c)

V.A. Rotor Dynamics and Angular Momentum Balance Rotor inertia is typically the most significant dynamic factor determining the engine's time lag during transitional processes. The inertia of the rotating assemblies (compressor blades, turbine blades, shafts) dictates the engine's ability to accelerate or decelerate in response to a change in fuel input. The dynamics of rotation are modeled through the application of the conservation of angular momentum. The angular acceleration of a spool (\frac{d\omega}{dt} or \frac{dN}{dt}) is directly proportional to the net imbalance between the work input (turbine power, W_T) and the work output (compressor power, W_C, plus load power, W_L), inversely scaled by the total mass moment of inertia (J) of the rotating parts. This relationship is expressed by the rotor motion differential equation: or equivalently, in terms of rotational speed (N): This differential equation is integrated numerically to calculate the rotational speed over time. High inertia causes a pronounced lag in the speed response when the fuel flow is abruptly changed, and this mechanical lag is critical for accurate transient control law design.

V.B. Modeling Fluid and Thermal Inertia In addition to mechanical inertia, the transient model must account for the time-dependent storage of mass and energy within the engine gas path and metal structure.

V.B.1. Volume Dynamics (Mass Storage) The inter-component volumes (cavities or plenums) that exist between turbomachinery stages and the combustion chamber act as fluid reservoirs, accumulating or depleting mass and energy instantaneously during transient flow. This phenomenon, often referred to as cavity dynamics or the inter-component volume technique, is modeled by applying the conservation of mass and energy equations directly to the control volume defined by the component plenum. The instantaneous pressure and temperature within a cavity change as a function of the difference between the mass flow rate entering (m_{in}) and leaving (m_{out}) that volume. Modeling this effect is crucial for accurately simulating high-frequency transients and predicting conditions like flow reversal during compressor surge.

V.B.2. Thermal Inertia Thermal inertia refers to the time delay caused by the finite heat capacity of the metal components (casings, rotors, turbine vanes) to changes in the gas path temperature. During transient operations, such as a rapid acceleration, the hot gas path temperature changes quickly, but the metal temperature lags significantly behind. This lag is modeled by defining a separate energy balance for the metal components. If a manifold wall has a mass M_w and a specific heat c_w, the change in mean wall temperature \vartheta_w(t) over time is modeled by a differential equation derived from the heat flow balance: where \dot{Q}_{in} and \dot{Q}_{out} represent the heat transfer between the gas, the metal, and the ambient environment (convection and radiation). Thermal inertia is vital because it influences the response speeds of both temperature and rotational speed, complicating the prediction of transient operating states.

V.C. Modeling Unsteady Flow Instabilities and Control System Integration Transient simulation is inherently linked to stability prediction and control system design. The model must accurately predict the proximity to aerodynamic instability boundaries (surge/stall and choke).

V.C.1. The Greitzer Model While surge and rotating stall are highly complex, distributed, 3D fluid dynamic phenomena , the core dynamics of this instability can be successfully captured using a reduced-order approach. The Greitzer lumped-parameter surge model is a seminal theoretical framework that models surge as a system instability resulting from the non-linear coupling between fluid inertia (analogous to electrical inductance, L) and fluid storage (analogous to capacitance, C) within the plenum volumes. This model uses a set of four first-order ODEs to simulate the instability cycle, demonstrating that 0D/1D methods can provide essential insights into complex, unsteady phenomena without requiring full spatial resolution.

V.C.2. Control System Integration A crucial application of 0D/1D transient models is the development and verification of the engine control unit (ECU) software and control laws. The control system, often employing proportional-integral (PI) strategies, dictates parameters such as fuel supply rate and variable geometry settings (e.g., variable stator vanes). The complexity of designing robust transient control laws, such as optimal acceleration schedules or min-max fuel controllers , lies in managing the interaction of rotor, thermal, and volume inertia effects. The control system must ensure that the engine achieves the desired power or thrust response quickly while strictly adhering to operational limits, such as maximum Turbine Inlet Temperature (TIT) and maintaining adequate surge margin. Consequently, the dynamic engine model must be fully integrated with a simulation of the fuel and control systems to investigate their coupled effects during engine transient processes. The relationship between dynamic factors, their underlying physics, and the modeling approach is summarized below: Key Dynamic Factors in Transient Modeling Dynamic Factor Rotor Inertia (J) Physical Origin Mass moment of inertia of rotating assemblies (shafts, blades) Modeling Approach (Governing Equation) Angular Momentum Balance (Torque Imbalance \rightarrow Angular Acceleration dN/dt) Impact on Transient Response Governs shaft speed acceleration/deceleratio n lag. Determines time delay. Thermal Inertia (M_w, c_w) Heat storage capacity of metal components (walls, rotors) Volume Dynamics (V) Fluid storage in inter-component volumes (plenums, Energy Balance for Metal Parts (\dot{Q}_{in} - \dot{Q}_{out}) Mass and Energy Conservation within finite control volumes Causes delayed and gradual changes in gas path temperatures and metal stress. Affects immediate pressure and mass flow response, critical for Dynamic Factor Physical Origin combustor) Modeling Approach (Governing Equation) Impact on Transient Response high-frequency transients and surge prediction.

VI. Computational Methods, Toolsets, and Fidelity Trade-offs

VI.A. Numerical Methods for 0D/1D Systems The solution of the reduced-order engine model requires specific numerical strategies tailored to the mathematical structure of 0D (DAE/ODE) and 1D (PDE) systems.

VI.A.1. 0D DAE/ODE Solvers For 0D transient simulations, the component models are aggregated into a coupled set of algebraic equations (from maps) and differential equations (from rotor, volume, and thermal dynamics). These DAEs must be solved numerically over time. Robust time integration schemes, such often based on implicit methods to maintain stability (though explicit methods can also be used), are employed to integrate the rotor motion and volume dynamics differential equations accurately.

VI.A.2. 1D PDE Solvers (Wave Propagation) For 1D flow modeling, particularly in analyzing duct systems or unsteady combustion phenomena, the governing hyperbolic partial differential equations must be solved. The industry standard for discretizing the flow domain (the ducts) and solving the conservation laws is the Finite Volume Method (FVM). The FVM is selected because it inherently ensures the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy across the computational domains. This conservation property is critical, especially when computational efficiency is prioritized by adopting very coarse meshes or large time steps. Traditional finite difference techniques often suffer from non-conservative behavior under such coarse discretization, whereas FVM maintains integrity, allowing for a significant reduction in computational nodes and increased time steps while still accurately capturing wave dynamics.

VI.B. Comparison of Simulation Fidelity and Trade-offs Zero-dimensional and one-dimensional models are characterized by their computational speed, achieved by sacrificing the spatial resolution available in 3D CFD. This spectrum of fidelity dictates the appropriate tool for different stages of the design process. Feature 0-Dimensional (0D) Model 1-Dimensional (1D) Model 3-Dimensional (3D) CFD Model Underlying Principle Lumped Parameter, Steady-State/Quasi-Ste ady Cycle Analysis Spatial Dependency None (Component Distributed Parameter, 1D Gas Dynamics and Wave Propagation Continuum Mechanics (Navier-Stokes) Along the primary flow Full 3D Spatial Feature 0-Dimensional (0D) Model treated as a single point/Black Box) Governing Equations Algebraic Equations (Steady State), ODEs/DAEs (Transient) Key Input Data Component Performance Maps, Design Point Characteristics 1-Dimensional (1D) Model path (e.g., axial distance) Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) solved via discretization Maps, Detailed Flow Path Geometry, Loss Coefficients Low to Medium (System studies) Detailed Transient Analysis, Duct/System Design, Unsteady Flow Dynamics 3-Dimensional (3D) CFD Model Resolution PDEs/DAEs (Navier-Stokes) Detailed Geometric Blade/Vane Profiles, Meshing Data Computational Cost Very Low (Quasi-Real Time) Primary Applications Conceptual Design, Performance Envelope Mapping, Control System Tuning While 3D simulation is essential for precisely designing a component and resolving detailed flow features, 0D/1D models excel at system integration and transient performance analysis. 0D models offer the highest calculation speed but rely almost entirely on component maps and thermodynamic cycles, requiring minimal geometry data. 1D models offer a balanced compromise, introducing spatial resolution for flow path elements and capturing distributed effects (like friction and heat transfer losses) with greater fidelity than 0D, making them ideal for dynamic systems where pressure wave effects are non-negligible. Very High (Component design, days/weeks) Component Optimization, Loss Mechanism Analysis VI.C. Industry Standard Software Toolsets The utility of 0D/1D simulation has driven the development of sophisticated, object-oriented software platforms capable of managing complex component interactions and multidisciplinary analyses. 1. Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS): A highly influential, government-sponsored tool (often associated with NASA) used across the aerospace industry. NPSS is fundamentally designed for thermodynamic system analysis, supporting preliminary design, steady-state off-design, transient performance, and flight test data correlation. It features an advanced solver capable of handling auto-setup, constraints, and discontinuities. 2. Gas Turbine Simulation Program (GSP): Developed by NLR, GSP is a component-based modeling environment utilizing a full thermo-chemical gas properties model. GSP is recognized for its flexibility, allowing the modeling of virtually any gas turbine cycle for steady-state or transient off-design analysis, often featuring configurable control system logic. 3. Commercial Multi-Physics Suites: Platforms such as GT-SUITE and AxSTREAM System Simulation (which replaces legacy tools like AxCYCLE and AxSTREAM NET) provide validated 0D/1D multi-physics component libraries. These tools are essential for modeling not just the core gas path, but also integrated subsystems like fuel circuits, cooling secondary flow systems, and complex thermal management networks.

VII. Conclusion Zero-dimensional (0D) and one-dimensional (1D) simulations are fundamental tools in modern gas turbine engineering, providing the speed and flexibility required to manage the complexity of performance prediction across the entire operational envelope. The 0D approach achieves its high efficiency by modeling components using the lumped parameter technique, relying heavily on generalized thermodynamic cycle principles and empirical characteristic maps. This fidelity level is sufficient for high-speed conceptual design and control system tuning, provided the underlying map data is accurate, recognizing that the model's predictive reliability is intrinsically constrained by the quality and necessary extrapolation of these maps. One-dimensional modeling extends this capability by solving the 1D conservation laws (mass, momentum, energy, and entropy) across spatially distributed elements. This capability is essential for capturing distributed effects like pressure losses and heat transfer, and for resolving unsteady wave propagation effects crucial for high-frequency transient and surge analysis. The integration of the Greitzer lumped-parameter model into this framework exemplifies the technique’s ability to predict highly complex, non-linear instabilities (surge) through the elegant reduction of physics to coupled ODEs representing fluid inertia and storage. Transient analysis in both 0D and 1D models is dominated by three coupled dynamic factors: rotor inertia, volume dynamics, and thermal inertia. The integration of these time-dependent phenomena—solved efficiently through robust numerical schemes like the Newton-Raphson method for algebraic matching and Finite Volume Methods for 1D flow dynamics—is non-negotiable for designing stable acceleration schedules and verifying engine control laws. Ultimately, 0D/1D simulations stand as the necessary bridge between rapid conceptual design and expensive 3D component optimization, defining the system-level behavior that governs the success of a modern gas turbine engine.

Works cited

1. Towards a Novel 0D Gas Turbine Combustor Modeling: Bridging the Gap Between Dimensional and Engine Performance Approaches - eucass, https://www.eucass.eu/doi/EUCASS2017-249.pdf

2. When To Use 1D Vs 3D Simulation For Engineering Design - SoftInWay Inc., https://www.softinway.com/when-to-use-1d-vs-3d-simulation/

3. 0D/1D-SIMULATION - FKFS, https://www.fkfs.de/fileadmin/FKFS/2_Kompetenzen/2.2_Virtuelle_Entwicklung/2.2.2_Virtuelle_ Antriebskomponente/Flyer_0D1D_Simulation_web_ENG.pdf

4. Run time Assessment for Gas Turbine Performance Simulation - Redalyc, https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3094/309456744014/html/

5. Gas Turbine Blade Simulation and Design Software - Ansys, https://www.ansys.com/applications/gas-turbines

6. Development of 1D Model of Constant-Volume Combustor and Numerical Analysis of the Exhaust Nozzle - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1191

7. Stage-by-Stage and Parallel Flow Path Compressor Modeling for a Variable Cycle Engine, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150018268/downloads/20150018268.pdf

8. What does 0D/1D simulation mean? - SIEMENS Community, https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/question/0D54O00006UsGtUSAV/what-does-0d1d-simulati on-mean

9. Lumped-element model - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumped-element_model

10. Numerical Modeling of Energy Systems Based on Micro Gas Turbine: A Review - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/900

11. Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9561079/

12. Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3103466/

13. Applications of the Conservation Laws – Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles, https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/applications-of-the-con servation-laws/

14. Transmission line model VS lumped parameters models, https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/545380/transmission-line-model-vs-lumped-pa rameters-models

15. Comparison of 0D and 1D duct system modeling for naturally aspirated spark ignition engines | Request PDF - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286959808_Comparison_of_0D_and_1D_duct_syste m_modeling_for_naturally_aspirated_spark_ignition_engines

16. Transient Behavior in Variable Geometry Industrial Gas Turbines: A Comprehensive Overview of Pertinent Modeling Techniques, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7926572/

17. 0D/1D Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Modeling Tools for the Simulation of Driving Cycles and the Optimization of IC Engine Performances and Emissions - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8125

18. Power Balance Strategies in Steady-State Simulation of the Micro Gas Turbine Engine by Component-Coupled 3D CFD Method - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/10/9/782

19. Preliminary Design of a Mini Gas Turbine via 1D Methodology - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8293

20. Practical Techniques for Modeling Gas Turbine Engine Performance, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170000884/downloads/20170000884.pdf

21. (PDF) On Gas Turbine Simulation Model Development - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335328380_On_Gas_Turbine_Simulation_Model_Development

22. Determining Steady-State Operation Criteria Using Transient Performance Modelling and Steady-State Diagnostics - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/7/2863

23. Practical Techniques for Modeling Gas Turbine Engine Performance - NASA Technical Reports Server, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160012485/downloads/20160012485.pdf

24. Compressor performance using (a) conventional 0D and (b) new 0D/1D component. - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Compressor-performance-using-a-conventional-0D-and-b-n ew-0D-1D-component_fig3_349654016

25. Compressor Efficiency Extrapolation for 0D-1D Engine Simulations | Request PDF, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301243059_Compressor_Efficiency_Extrapolation_for 0D-1DEngine_Simulations

26. A surge and choke capable compressor flow model - DiVA portal, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:620108/FULLTEXT01.pdf

27. 1-D Flow and Network Modeling (Chapter 3) - Gas Turbines, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/gas-turbines/1d-flow-and-network-modeling/91CD37D53 1AE3E551DB40E281C125D64

28. Transient Behavior in Variable Geometry Industrial Gas Turbines: A Comprehensive Overview of Pertinent Modeling Techniques - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/2/250

29. Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines - Unife, https://www.unife.it/ing/lm.meccanica/insegnamenti/fluidodinamica-delle-macchine/materiale-did attico/JT_V115_621-656.pdf

30. Validation of one- dimensional loss models for axial gas turbines - Lund University Publications, https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8885275/file/8885295.pdf

31. Quasi-one-dimensional compressible flow across face seals and narrow slots I, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19720017818/downloads/19720017818.pdf

32. A Generalized One Dimensional Computer Code for Turbomachinery Cooling - Passage Flow Calculations, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19890013491/downloads/19890013491.pdf

33. Quasi-One-Dimensional Loss Model of Volute Using Boundary Layer Approach for Inward Flow Radial Supercritical CO2 Turbines - ASME Digital Collection, https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article/146/1/011019/1168895/Quasi-O ne-Dimensional-Loss-Model-of-Volute-Using

34. Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems, https://ftp.idu.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ebook/tdg/ADVANCED%20ENGINE%20TECHNOLOGY %20AND%20PERFORMANCE/epdf.pub_introduction-to-modeling-and-control-of-internal-c.pdf

35. (PDF) A New Approach of Gas Turbine Component Matching for Electrical Power Generation - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319152133_A_New_Approach_of_Gas_Turbine_Com ponent_Matching_for_Electrical_Power_Generation

36. A new approach of gas turbine component matching for electrical ..., https://pure.uhi.ac.uk/files/2289705/A_new_approach_of_gas_turbine_component_matching_fo r_electrical_power_generation.pdf

37. application of newton – raphson method to analyze thermal efficiency of gas turbine before and after engine replacement - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365378753_APPLICATION_OF_NEWTON_-_RAPHSON_METHOD_TO_ANALYZE_THERMAL_EFFICIENCY_OF_GAS_TURBINE_BEFORE_AND AFTERENGINE_REPLACEMENT

38. Performance Prediction and Simulation of Gas Turbine Engine Operation - DTIC, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA403085.pdf

39. HD GAS TURBINE 0D/1D MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION - Webthesis, https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/23404/

40. GPPS-TC-2023-0292, https://gpps.global/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/GPPS-TC-2023_paper_292.pdf

41. Modeling and Simulation Study of A Dynamic Gas Turbine System In A Virtual Test Bed Environment - Scholar Commons, https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=3255&context =etd

42. a gas turbine dynamic model for simulation and control - ASME Digital Collection, https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/GT/proceedings-pdf/GT1998/78637/V002T03A002/24097 88/v002t03a002-98-gt-078.pdf

43. NI\S/\ - NASA Technical Reports Server, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19820024492/downloads/19820024492.pdf

44. Transient Dynamics of Gas Turbine Engines - SciSpace, https://scispace.com/pdf/transient-dynamics-of-gas-turbine-engines-x5d5lfepno.pdf

45. Transient Optimization of a Gas Turbine Engine, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220016302/downloads/TransientOptimization_7.pdf

46. A Surge/Stall-Capable Dynamic Performance Simulation Methodology for a Turbojet Engine | J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power | ASME Digital Collection, https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article/146/2/021002/1166800/A-Surge Stall-Capable-Dynamic-Performance

47. Investigation on the Influence of Thermal Inertia on the Dynamic Characteristics of a Gas Turbine - MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/12/8/1699

48. (PDF) Modelling the Transient Behaviour of Gas Turbines - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337070316_Modelling_the_Transient_Behaviour_of_G as_Turbines

49. Gas Turbine Design, Components and System Design Integration, https://ftp.idu.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ebook/tdg/ADVANCED%20ENGINE%20TECHNOLOGY %20AND%20PERFORMANCE/Gas%20Turbine%20Design,%20Components%20and%20Syst em%20Design%20Integration%20by%20Meinhard%20T.%20Schobeiri%20(z-lib.org).pdf

50. Lumped parameter model. | Download Scientific Diagram - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Lumped-parameter-model_fig1_4142966

51. Interactive model for surge and stall in compressors - James Brind, https://jamesbrind.uk/posts/greitzer/

52. Transient performance simulation of gas turbine engine integrated with fuel and control systems - CERES Research Repository, https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/items/0ceb9dc4-0f50-4982-ad05-db6fd2d94514 53. Steady and Transient Performance Prediction of Gas Turbine Engines - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS), https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920019215

54. Computational fluid dynamics-based design method for gas turbine internal flow field optimization - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385501293_Computational_fluid_dynamics-based_de sign_method_for_gas_turbine_internal_flow_field_optimization

55. Large-eddy Simulation of Realistic Gas Turbine Combustors, https://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~sva/archive/moinapte_aiaaj_06.pdf

56. 0D/1D Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Modeling Tools for the Simulation of Driving Cycles and the Optimization of IC Engine Performances an, https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/e0c31c12-5a59-4599-e053-1705fe0aef77/0d1d-thermofluid-dyn amic-modeling-tools-for-the-simulation-of-driving-cycles-and-the-optimization-of-ic-engine-perfor mances-and-emissions.pdf

57. Generic Analysis Methods for Gas Turbine Engine Performance - TU Delft Repository, https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid:f95da308-e7ef-47de-abf2-aedbfa30cf63

58. Object-Oriented Approach for Gas Turbine - Engine Simulation - NASA Technical Reports Server, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950024173/downloads/19950024173.pdf

59. Object-oriented approach for gas turbine engine simulation, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950024173

60. Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) | SwRI, https://www.swri.org/markets/electronics-automation/software/aerospace-software/numerical-pro pulsion-system-simulation-npss

61. About GSP - Gas turbine Simulation Program, https://gspteam.com/about.html

62. Gas turbine Simulation Program, https://gspteam.com/

63. Aerospace - Gamma Technologies, https://www.gtisoft.com/aerospace-simulation/

64. Power Generation - Gamma Technologies, https://www.gtisoft.com/power-generation-simulation/

65. AxSTREAM Platform | Turbomachinery & System Design Software - SoftInWay, https://www.softinway.com/software-solutions/axstream/